|Why did Jefferson believe the “small landholders were the most precious part of a State?”|
Dear Lark, In a letter penned on October 28, 1785, Thomas Jefferson records a pivotal experience that illustrated why the land must be owned by the citizens and not retained by the government. Walking through the French countryside, Jefferson’s personal encounter with a day laborer confirms his understanding of this fundamental truth; that every citizen has the right to own and cultivate the land, and that the protection of this right is essential to the ensuring individual liberty for every American.
|To Reverend James MadisonFontainebleau Oct. 28. 1785. Dear Sir, Seven o’clock, and retired to my fireside, I have determined to enter into conversation with you; this is a village of about 5,000 inhabitants when the court is not here and 20,000 when they are, occupying a valley through which runs a brook, and on each side of it a ridge of small mountains most of which are naked rock. The king comes here in the fall always, to hunt. His court attends him, as do also the foreign diplomatic corps. But as this is not indispensably required, and my finances do not admit the expense of a continued residence here, I propose to come occasionally to attend the king’s levees, returning again to Paris, distant 40 miles.|
This being the first trip, I set out yesterday morning to take a view of the place. For this purpose, I shaped my course towards the highest of the mountains in sight, to the top of which was about a league. As soon as I had got clear of the town I fell in with a poor woman walking at the same rate with myself and going the same course. Wishing to know the condition of the laboring poor I entered into conversation with her, which I began with inquiries for the path which would lead me into the mountain: and thence proceeded to inquiries into her vocation, condition, and circumstance. She told me she was a day laborer, at 8. sous or 4 d. sterling the day; that she had two children to maintain, and to pay a rent of 30 livres for her house (which would consume the hire of 75 days), that often she could get no employment, and of course was without bread. As we had walked together nearly a mile and she had so far served me as a guide, I gave her, on parting 24 sous. She burst into tears of a gratitude which I could perceive was unfeigned, because she was unable to utter a word. She had probably never before received so great an aid. This little attendrissement, with the solitude of my walk, led me into a train of reflections on that unequal division of property which occasions the numberless instances of wretchedness that I had observed in this country and is to be observed all over Europe. The property of this country is absolutely concentered in very few hands, having revenues of from half a million guineas a year downwards.
These employ the flower of the country as servants, some of them having as many as 200 domestics, not laboring. They employ also a great number of manufacturers, tradesmen, and lastly the class of laboring husbandmen. But after all, these come the most numerous of all the classes, that is, the poor who cannot find work. I asked myself what could be the reason that so many should be permitted to beg who are willing to work, in a country where there is a very considerable proportion of uncultivated lands. These lands are kept idle mostly for the sake of the game. It should seem then that it must be because of the enormous wealth of the proprietors which places them above attention to the increase of their revenues by permitting these lands to be labored. I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable.
But the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery for the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. The descent of property of every kind therefore to all the children, or all the brothers and sisters, or other relations in equal degree is a political measure and a practicable one. Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there is in any country, uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right.
The earth is given as a common stock for man to labor and live on. If, for the encouragement of industry we allow it to be appropriated, we must take care that other employment be furnished to those excluded from the appropriation. If we do not the fundamental right to labor the earth returns to the unemployed. It is too soon yet in our country to say that every man who cannot find employment but who can find uncultivated land, shall be at liberty to cultivate it, paying a moderate rent. But it is not too soon to provide by every possible means that as few as possible shall be without a little portion of land. The small landholders are the most precious part of a state….
To learn more about American Standards click here.